There has also been an argument that violence will also be experienced in the absence of the guns. There are other weapons that can be used to perpetrate violence, and other factors should be considered in controlling violence apart from confiscating guns and bringing other laws that control gun possession. For instance, there was reported a case where a young man stabbed his fellow student with a screwdriver in a high school. He did not need a gun to commit the murder, yet there was crime in the school.
People are also denied freedom of some activities such as hunting. For many people, hunting is a hobby, and a gun is used in hunting the wild animals. When there are gun control laws, it is very obvious that they are deprived of their interest in their hobby. For these reasons, there should no be gun control laws, as people should be allowed to use the guns at their discretion Dixon, Most Americans cling to the second amendment that allows citizens to hold firearms wherever they go for their own safety.
Most people also believe that the second amendment was placed so that the citizens would be protected from the tyrannical government that seemed to keep people in fear. People would have the power to rebel in case the government introduced dictatorial policies for their people. However, though this was not the main aim why people were issued with guns, it served as a purpose as the power of the government would be regulated in a way that the people would be given a chance to make their own ideas and also be given a voice in the government.
This is because of the power they were believed to have after they were given the go- ahead to possess the firearms. The second amendment states that the right of people to keep their arms should not be infringed by any means. The amendment mentions a well- regulated militia which is a phrase that means a group of citizens that act in position of an army.
It continues to describe that it is necessary to the security of a free state. In this phrase, it means that the group will be in the frontline in making sure that it meets the goals and the interests of the citizen army. The main objective of the citizen army is to protect the best interests of the country, as well as, protecting the government also from foreign intervention.
This means that when the gun control laws are being introduced, the main intention of introducing the second amendment is being assumed. This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves.
The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion. The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government.
However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions.
For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people. If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not. In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people. People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people.
The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun. Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence.
For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication. It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence.
The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him. This is because even after taking the gun, the drug effects may show him to use other weapons to commit the crime. Around the country, many teachers and professors are pushing their students to think about this subject and write at length about ways to limit gun violence.
By no means are these papers easy to write; due to the emotional ramifications of this issue, writing a paper on gun control must be done in a very professional manner.
Before doing that, though, feel free to check out this sample research paper on gun control. Gun control has recently created a massive uproar throughout the United States because of the recent, and sincerely unfortunate, Sandy Hook school shooting that occurred last December.
In response to this tragedy, Democratic leaders have been attempting to capitalize on the incident and push forward their respective agenda of limiting gun rights.
As one can imagine, there are a surfeit of opinions on the subject, but despite this fact, I have come to affirm that I am strong believer in strengthening gun control. Since becoming a staple of American society through the second amendment , guns have been instrumental in altering contemporary warfare. The dangers of these weapons are not a secret; it is simply their mere nature.
This statistic expresses the sincere lethality of guns compared to other forms of weaponry. One of the main reasons for this data stems from the misuse of guns , which unlike other weapons, can cause death to the user and those around him or her even on accident. If this unfortunate probability can be decreased, how can we stand around as the leader of the free world and let nothing be done?
In the American political system, gun control has been a debate for many years ; however, recent shootings have forced it into a large spotlight. The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment.
On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times necessary. Past and present governmental action of this nation proves that the danger that arises from the use of guns is so high that it values the general security of citizens higher than the individual rights of gun owners.
Obviously, the total eradication of guns is extreme and unrealistic. What American political leaders can do, however, is implement stronger laws and regulations to decrease the supply, access to, and lethality of the weapons available to the general public.
This would help to decrease gun deaths, gun violence, and raise national security. These laws required a 5-day waiting period on all gun sales so that thorough background checks could be implemented. Also, whenever multiple handgun purchases were to occur, they were now allowed to be reported to the police. Those that were deemed mentally ill by the courts were not allowed to purchase weapons and American leaders emphasized that the Laws may have in fact prevented gun violence from spreading.
According to Bob Adams, these legislative actions had extremely positive effects. And the number of licensed gun dealers dropped from , to , in three years. President Obama sees the need for the reinstatement of these sensible regulations and has incorporated them into his gun control proposal.
On January 8 th , , the Newtown, Connecticut elementary school shooting occurred and took the lives of 27 students and teachers. This tragedy, at first, dropped jaws across the nation but immediately after caused an enormous social riot about gun control and the laws surrounding them.
Shortly after the incident, President Obama made a statement on the matter and sent his condolences to those directly affected. He did not, however, let his stance on gun control be known.
During the Clinton Presidential era, Biden was a very strong proponent and leading force of the Assault Weapons ban. This powerful statement calls for methods outside of the political realm and yearns for more of a moral decision to be made. In terms of weaponry, this proposal mirrors the gun ban of because it is just a reinstatement of the original ban packaged with an abundance of extra regulations.
We are always happy to help you with. Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers. If you choose to write a research paper on gun control, however, you will still find that the topic is too broad and you will have to narrow it.
Gun Control Analytical Research Paper Back to all templates. Share. Download. The first paragraph of your research paper should help your reader to understand why your topic is meaningful or important. Gun control is a term referring to the various laws and policies that regulate everything related to the use of firearms by civilians.
You can cite these or any of thousands of other gun control articles to buttress your argument. (Read 5 Best Resources to Help With Writing a Research Paper if you need assistance researching more scholarly sources.). Whichever side of the issue you take, make sure to mention the source, cite it properly (in-text and in your Works Cited or References list), and format direct quotations. Research on gun violence is notoriously underfunded, but the data we do have shows that lawmakers can act to save lives from gun violence Jun 22, · Sloppy medical research into “gun " textiles gcse coursework help" violence” isn’t confined to the CDC.
Against Gun Control Essay The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of. Gun Control Will Not Reduce Crime - Introduction The implementation of gun control in the United states is a large problem as it will take away the 2nd Amendment rights and would also stop the ability of law abiding citizens to protect themselves from criminals who obtain guns illegally.