This indicates that a larger proportion of the population does not like smoking; indeed, one of the smokers did not like smoking.
Overall, these results indicate that a partial on smoking would be more popular than a complete one. The results also indicate that the majority of people do not like smoking; I consider this to be a good thing for society.
People have the right to do as they please so long as they do not break the law. By that reasoning people should be allowed to smoke in public. This is a fair argument so long as there is no law against smoking. My questionnaire indicates that many people think that there should be a partial ban on smoking. This therefore nullifies the libertarian argument as it is debatable whether people should have the right to smoke.
Against this, however, some would argue that banning smoking would be a detraction from people's rights and therefore morally wrong. Thus we should not ban smoking in public places. Also, if other people don't like smoking, they should leave the vicinity of the smoker; it is the individual's choice whether or not they smoke, therefore it should also be the individual's choice whether or not to leave.
However this begs the question, why should the person doing the damage have priority? Smoking generates large amounts of money through taxation, admittedly smoking cost the National Health Service, yet the NHS is not a business run for profit. The purpose of the NHS is to keep the nation healthy, not to intrude upon the rights of the individual.
There can be no argument against the NHS persuading people not to smoke, yet it is still the right of the individual to decide whether or not they wish to smoke. Some groups argue that there is no definitive proof that smoking causes cancer.
This is strictly true. However this begs the question, is it worth the risk just because the proof is not concrete? This argument is, to some extent, nullified by epidemiological research. These risks tend to be greater in groups that start smoking younger, smoke for longer, smoke more cigarettes per day and? Based completely upon medical, biological and chemical reasoning I would ban smoking completely. Ethically, however, I do not believe it is right to completely ban something without a national referendum or something similar.
Also I think that an immediate outright ban on the sale of all tobacco products would drive it underground and therefore give it a sort of prestige. Finally I also believe that such a ban would not work as too many people do it and thus it would have to be a series of bans and the like. This is actually visible in government policy with the gradual banning of all tobacco advertisements.
I think that smoking should be banned in public places so as to facilitate a significant lowering in social smoking and passive smoking and could lead to higher levels of banning and a gradual reduction in the number of people who smoke in our society.
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction Is the main idea i. Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading? Learn more about the different types of essays. One of these factors is the laws and regulations that govern any country. The writer needs to read extensively relevant materials that explain what the law of the land is regarding smoking.
Some countries allow smokers and nonsmokers to mix without any problem, regardless of whether one is smoking in congested areas or not. In such countries, smokers are expected make ethical decisions and think about the effect of their smoke on the people who do not smoke.
Another point the argumentative essay should explain is whether there is any law that forbids smokers from using cigarettes in public. In such countries, the law explains where smoking zones are located, if any, and the punishment that smokers should face if they break the law by smoking in non-smoking zones.
In any argumentative essay, the writer should be able to show the contradicting views of people. For instance, in the argumentative essay on smoking in public places, the writer should explain what the consequences are for not setting up smoking zones. The reason is that some people may argue that smoking in public places has no negative effects that warrant its ban, while others may argue out that smoking in public places is so bad and dangerous that governments should ban it completely in towns.
The writer should not present just the legislation, or desired future legislation. This does not get to the root of the argument, it rather illustrates that there is an argument. What are needed are the clear roots of the argument to be exposed and debated.
These roots are primarily based in health concerns. The claims that second hand smoke leads to serious health problems must be the strong focus. Voices for and against this position must be clearly presented. In addition, you must back legal arguments using the legal framework in existence in good detail.
Generalizations of the laws and their background will not be strong enough. The essay should not consider only one side of the debate, as this is a major clash between millions of people and governments worldwide.
Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your .
Free smoking ban papers, essays, and research papers.
SHOULD CIGARETTE SMOKING BE BANNED? Essay sample by my essay writing com. Introduction. Cigarette, a long cylindrical roll of tobacco has been smoked by men for centuries. However, due to the fact that it has been the cause of several debilitating diseases, there have long been calls for it to be banned. Smoking essay is another tool to tell people about the negative effects of the habit. Still need ideas on creating an argumentative essay on banning tobacco? Feel free to check samples of such essays or watch talk shows.
Ban Smoking In Public Places Essay. Banning smoking in public places Before people start smoking they have a choice, but once you are a smoker that choice goes and you then become an addict. Smoking is the inhalation and exhalation of . Keywords: smoking ban essay, public smoking essay The numbers of people who smoke have increase over the years. Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking can be, people still choose to smoke.